Interpretation and countermeasures of the new standard for "Determination of mildew resistance of paint films"
Time:2021-10-18 16:42
GB/T 1741-2020 Improving the mildew resistance of paint films
The new version of the standard, "Determination Method for Mildew Resistance of Paint Films", GB/T 1741-2020, will be officially implemented on October 1, 2021. It puts forward higher requirements for the mildew resistance performance of products. Mildew prevention measures that met the original standard may fail to pass the new standard's testing. Upgrading and replacing paint products and using highly efficient and environmentally friendly mildew-proofing agents are imperative.
I. Key Differences Between the Old and New Versions
The key differences between the old and new versions of the standard that affect the mildew resistance results are listed in Table 1 below.
Table 1. Key Differences Between the Old and New Versions of GB/T 1741
Key Differences | 2020 Version | 2007 Version |
Substrate | Mainly aluminum plates | Mostly mineral building materials |
Test Panel Aging Method | According to GB/T 23987-2009 8.2.1 Requirements Aged for 100h, Irradiance: 0.83w.m -2 .nm -1 |
24h flushing with running tap water |
Test Fungi | Alternaria alternata | Aureobasidium pullulans |
Nutrient Culture Medium | Containing sucrose | Without sucrose |
II. Comparison of Mildew Resistance Test Results of the Old and New Standards
Paint products with a mildew resistance level of 0 according to GB/T 1741-2007 for 28/56 days showed a level 3 after 28 days and level 4 after 56 days according to the 2020 version. Test data is shown in Table 2, and sample images are shown in Figures 1-4.
This shows that products with a very high mildew resistance level according to the original standard have a much lower mildew resistance level according to the new standard.
Table 2. Different Results of 28/56-Day Tests Using the Old and New Standards
Number of Mildew Growth According to 2007 Version Data
28-Day Area (%) | 56-Day Area (%) | ||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of Mildew Growth According to 2020 Version Data
28-Day Area (%) | 56-Day Area (%) | ||||
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ |
50 | 55 | 30 | 60 | 65 | 35 |
Figure 1. GB/T 1741-2007, Mildew Resistance Test 28 Days
Figure 2. GB/T 1741-2020, Mildew Resistance Test 28 Days
Figure 3. GB/T 1741-2007, Mildew Resistance Test 56 Days
Figure 4. GB/T 1741-2020, Mildew Resistance Test 56 Days
III. Mildew Prevention Solution Upgrade
3.1 Mildew-proofing agents for the new standard should have:
• UV stability, high temperature and humidity stability
• High efficiency and cost-effectiveness
• Compliance with GB/T 35602-2017 "Green Product Evaluation Paints" regarding the types and limits of biocides, such as the prohibition of BCM, and the limitation of OIT and DCOIT to ≤500mg/kg, and IPBC and ZnP to ≤1500mg/kg.
3.2 Recommended High-Efficiency and Environmentally Friendly Mildew-Proofing Agents :
• ACTICIDE® LPC11: A combination product of ZnP and OIT, with very broad-spectrum antibacterial and mildew-proofing properties.
• ACTICIDE® IOG: A combination product of IPBC and OIT, especially suitable for interior and exterior wall coatings, wood protection products, adhesives, fillers, and sealants.
• ACTICIDE® ZPD 1: An aqueous dispersion with ZnP as the active ingredient, effectively preventing the growth of mold and algae on indoor and outdoor coatings.
3.3 Thor New generation AMME ™ Technology dry film mildew-proofing agent:
AMME ™ Advanced Microcarrier Embedding Technology, which can prolong the effective period of mildew-resistant active substances and better resist high temperatures, high alkalinity, rain, and ultraviolet radiation.
Figures 5 and 6 compare the active substance loss curves of traditional dry film mildew-proofing agents and AMME™ mildew-proofing agents. The curve using AMME™ technology is gentler, more UV-resistant, and provides better mildew-proofing effects.
Figure 5. Comparison of Mildew-Proofing Agent Active Ingredient Loss Over Time
Figure 6. AMME™ products have higher UV stability in coating applications
IV. Test data of the recommended mildew-proofing solution under the new standard
Table 3 and Figure 7 show the mold growth resistance data and corresponding sample images of two mildewproof agents tested according to the GB/T 1741-2020 standard. Even at low concentrations, they effectively inhibit mold growth.
Table 3: New Standard Test Results for Different Mildewproof Schemes
Number | Sample Name | 28 Mold Growth Area (%) | 28 Mildew Resistance Grade |
1 | Blank | 50 | 3 |
2 | 0.5% LPC 11 | 0 | 0 |
3 | 0.3% ZPD 1 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 7, GB/T 1741-2020, 28-day test
V. Conclusion:
With the implementation of GB/T 1741-2020, selecting environmentally friendly and efficient mildewproof solutions is crucial to meet the increasingly stringent market demands for coating mildew resistance performance and to rapidly achieve updates and iterations of coating products.